Wednesday, 11 May 2016

Entry #8, May 11 2016

Gary Dimmock, Postmedia News | April 27, 2016 | Last Updated: Apr 27 10:31 AM ET


Overview:
This article talks about a father from Kanata Canada, who is a former RCMP that starved and tortured his 11 year old sun because the father thought that his son had the devil inside of him and he thought that his son would be a future sex offender. The father is claimed to have chained his son inside his basement and cut down the boy's food rations every day and he also was questioned for assaulting the son and burning him with a barbecue lighter. The boy often spoke about how he just wanted to be back with his family but the father was resentful. The father, as the defendant spoke about how he was extremely scared for every one in his family from the threat of the 11 year old boy and he claims that he had an old friend who had the same look in his eyes as the boy, this old friend of the father's became a sex offender. The dad further explained that he suspected the boy would beat his siblings and rape members of the family. He then stated that he was 100 percent sure this was the case. There were even claims that the father starved the child so terribly that the child was  forced to drink his own urine. Eventually the boy escaped as he was in desperate need of water. After the matter, the boy weighed 50 pounds at the age of 11 which is not normal. The father was later charged for many different offences such as assault, forced confinement, and fail to provide basic necessities. Also in the father's defense he spoke about how he did not even know that this was something bad that he was doing and that the boy would often reject him when told to do something. When the boy would refuse to do homework the father finally pulled his son out of school in 2012 and has home schooled him since. Finally, one of the points in the article mentions that the father had a rough past, growing up in Lebonan and being raped as a child. The article speaks about how this could be one of the problems for the father that causes the issues.

The young boy states.

Opinion:
In the article, there was not enough lead up evidence for reasons that the father suspected this horror from his own son, for me to even slightly regard the matter, there would have to be many circumstances of abnormal activities from the boy. This is clearly a horrible matter and I feel that a large portion of it has to do with the mental health of this father who was a former RCMP. Most people would think that there is no way a strong, proud Mountie would ever think or do something like this but it seems that anything could happen, or maybe this man should have never been a Mountie, there is also the possibility that there is lots of information we are missing. It is completely unacceptable that someone acts so disgustingly just because they merely think that their child will become a bad person or a sex offender, they have no proof of how this could happen in the future. It is unfair for the child. From a civic point of view, I believe that the father is fully at fault for this and it is absurd that an ex police officer does not know these laws. The man may have thought that his son was possessed but this does not mean he has to torture his son and ruin his entire life. I also feel that there is a piece of the puzzle we are missing, there must be more to why an RCMP would ever starve his own child. I think that a large portion of the blame could go to the mental health condition of this RCMP, and he should be checked for this after his suspension.

If I were to put myself in the father's shoes (even though I could not imagine this happening) I would simply enforce the rules of goodness toward the boy as much as possible and make sure that he is the best he could be. I feel that a civic solution for this could have been for the father to primarily tell someone else outside of his family how he feel about his son, for example, the father could have told a friend or cousin and they could have assessed it together and even in the unlikeliness of them agreeing on the boy being possessed(unlikely), they could seek medical treatment and assessment for the boy etc. Something like this could have easily stopped this issue from occurring from its roots. Another solution that I strongly feel should be implemented for the father, is that he goes to rehabilitation for his experiences and for how he feels about the situation. This could help the father with his mental health which seems to be an issue and maybe he could love each member of his family once and for all. Finally I believe that the young boy should have some time away from his father in a safe area where he can rebuild himself and be rehabilitated from his horrible experience.

Sunday, 1 May 2016

Entry #7, April 30 2016

John Ridsdel execution: Why refusing to pay ransoms may not protect Canadians

Trudeau says Canada won't pay ransoms 'directly or indirectly'

By Mark Gollom, CBC News Posted: Apr 26, 2016 7:27 PM ET Last Updated: Apr 27, 2016 9:37 AM ET
Overview:
In this article, it talks about two Canadians who were captured by an Al-Queda organization and one of them, John Ridsdel was executed by one of the terrorist member, Abu Sayyaf. This execution was ordered after Ridsdel was ordered to pay money to the terrorists that who could not come up with. The question for Canada paying ransoms to terrorists is on the line as Canada has a strict law of not paying direct or indirect ransoms to terrorists. Trudeau stated that ransoms are what pay terrorists and that this could be a threat to any Canadian travelling abroad. A vice president for intelligence at Stratfor said in response that even if we say we do not pay ransoms, it will not reduce the amount of kidnappings by terrorists. It is known that Canada does not pay ransoms to terrorists, however there was a record found of a ransom of 1.1 million $ payed in ransom in 2009 to free Canadian diplomats Robert Fowler and Louis Guay. This same problem has occurred with other European countries that have been known to pay ransoms yet they have a denial policy. The article then talks about the 3rd party situation. Governments that have a no ransom policy often hire third party groups to secretly pay off the ransoms, however, these third party groups attempt at neutralizing the enemy in the process of the rescue and there are professional parties who do this.Then the topic of reasons of kidnappings arises in this article, researchers and experts on terrorism weighed in on the situations and the statement that terrorists do not go for British or American hostages because they know that these countries do not pay ransoms. An expert then said that there is no evidence to prove this claim. An expert researcher-Adam Dolnik says that a solution to this could be that the governments have no ransom policies but have secret ransom paying systems with non-disclosure approval, these transactions would happen in the background and could be flexible in what goes on during the paying of the ransoms. Dolnik then talks about how they should not just immediately be going off and paying every future ransom, but the governments should study each case separately and deal with it accordingly but with precision.
Cabinet Retreat 20160426
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says Canada 'does not and will not pay ransom to terrorists.' (Jeff McIntosh/Canadian Press)http://www.cbc.ca/news/john-ridsdel-kidnapping-ransom-1.3553712?cmp=rss
Opinion:
This obvious discussion in this topic is the paying or non paying of ransom laws in different countries. Some points to consider could be how I would handle this if it were one of my family members in Ridsdel's position, and also the fact that these negotiations may not work, even if they do, this means we would still be funding terrorists. What is the solution could be the question. In my opinion, if I were Justin Trudeau I would also present a no-ransom policy because this gives reassurance to the majority of the population. However, I do take into consideration, the action plan of Mr, Dolnik and I believe that the government should have a secret third party group for handling these situations, if they get out of hand. The other problem is that if the government does have another background group do the ransom transactions, if we do not eliminate the kidnappers in a fashionable amount of time, the issue of funding the terrorist organisations could get out of hand and this could ultimately cause the fact that we would be helping them expand. To put this issue into perspective and from a civic point of view, if one of my family members, say my father, was kidnapped I would obviously want the ransom to be payed. This issue has many different perspectives to be viewed from and I feel one of the main controversial factors is that it depends on how important the person is to the Canadian government to evaluate how much that person is worth saving.However, every person in our society will be important to someone. Overall, I feel that Canada should pay more attention to this issue and that the government must devise a much more strategic approach with third party organisation involved, to solve the kidnapping problems in our country.